Regulatory Affairs

  • Regulatory Affairs
  • The Solution to Shorter SEND Timelines

    Are you currently experiencing challenges with SEND, specifically when it comes to timelines? You can rely on Altasciences to ask the right questions from the get-go, to smoothly guide you through the SEND process and help you avoid potential delays in the preparation of reliable SEND datasets for your regulatory submissions.

    Contact our SEND team today to experience the difference.

    Contact SEND Expert

    .custom-column-left-text { float: left; width: 50%; padding-right: 10px; } .custom-column-right-text { float: right; width: 45%; text-align:center; } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .custom-column-left-text, .custom-column-right-text, .custom-column-flc-ebook-text { float:none; width:80%; margin:0 auto; } }

    David Grégoire joined Altasciences as Director of Quality Assurance in 2012.

    Frequently asked SEND questions & Pro tips

    Navigating the SEND requirements can be complicated. By asking the right questions upfront, you'll be able to choose a knowledgeable and experienced partner who can guide you through the process, help you avoid potential delays and prepare reliable SEND datasets for FDA submissions.

    Before you choose your SEND partner, read our frequently asked questions and quick pro tips.

    Learn more

    Are you SEND-ready?

    You need SEND. We can help.

    Compliant and reliable datasets for your nonclinical study data are critical for successful FDA submissions. To ensure you are SEND-ready, our SEND team can help guide you through the requirements and the challenges. Altasciences uses submitTM software to create datasets, and Pinnacle 21 to ensure data integrity.

    handshake

    Partner With Confidence.

    • A seamless process. Our dedicated SEND team works onsite to ensure your data from collection to submission is accurately converted. With a single point of contact, your SEND expert will be accessible to answer your questions from start to finish.

    • Experience. As active members of the CDISC SEND Consortium and PhUSE (Pharmaceutical User Software Exchange) nonclinical working groups, our team contributes to the development of SEND standards and remains at the forefront of these evolving standards to support best practices.

    • Rapid turnaround. We understand the importance of your timelines and can prepare submission-ready files within two weeks. Interim datasets are also available for submission or for data warehousing purposes.

    package

    What can I expect to receive in my SEND package?

    • SAS Transport Files (XPT format)
    • Define file (XML format)
    • Study Data Reviewer's Guide [nSDRG] (DOC format)
    • Additional formats are available upon request

    book

    What do I need to know about recent and upcoming changes to SEND?

    • Effective March 15, 2019, SEND 3.1 is required for single- and repeat-dose general toxicology, Carcinogenicity studies and Safety Pharmacology studies for NDA, ANDA, and certain BLA submissions.

    • Effective March 15, 2020, SEND 3.1 is required for single- and repeat-dose general toxicology, Carcinogenicity studies and Safety Pharmacology studies for IND submissions.

    What is Altasciences doing to prepare for the future of SEND?

    NEW EMA SAFETY GUIDELINES

    NEW EMA SAFETY GUIDELINES

    The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has updated its guidance on first-in-human (FIH) clinical trials. The objective is to help drug sponsors "transition from non-clinical to early clinical development and in identifying factors influencing risk for new investigational medicinal products".

    The EMA updated the guideline since trial protocols have become "increasingly complex" with more multiple ascending dose clinical trials and trials that often include different parts within a single protocol.

    The updated guideline includes considerations on quality aspects, non-clinical and clinical testing strategies, study design and the conduct of FIH/early clinical trials. It also includes guidance on the handling of adverse events in relation to stopping rules, and information on how to progress to the next dosing level. A new section was added entitled "Dosing selection for FIH and early clinical trials" to offer guidance on determining the starting dose for healthy volunteers and patients; criteria for dose escalation; defining the maximum exposure; moving from single to multiple dosing; and determining the route of administration.

    View new guideline

    At Altasciences, we are always aligned with the latest guidances for your FIH clinical trials. We place the safety and well-being of trial participants at the forefront of our drug development programs and ensure that we continuously apply the experience gained from over 200 FIH studies we have conducted.

    We have built a robust feasibility process that closely considers the risks of every study we run, with particular focus on FIH studies. The process of evaluating and mitigating risks starts the day we first talk to our sponsor about the study and continues until we have dosed the last patient. Our audits by European regulators, such as MHRA, have consistently had positive results and have given us useful feedback on the safety requirements we must meet.

    Why should you work with us?
    awards

    The FDA Animal Rule and Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data (SEND)

    .custom-column-left-text { float: left; width: 50%; padding-right: 10px; } .custom-column-right-text { float: right; width: 45%; text-align:center; } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .custom-column-left-text, .custom-column-right-text, .custom-column-flc-ebook-text { float:none; width:80%; margin:0 auto; } }

    Biologic drugs came on the market with the production of

    .custom-column-left-text { float: left; width: 50%; padding-right: 10px; } .custom-column-right-text { float: right; width: 45%; text-align:center; } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .custom-column-left-text, .custom-column-right-text, .custom-column-flc-ebook-text { float:none; width:80%; margin:0 auto; } }

    In June 2016, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) released a new policy on the use of a

    On March 22, 2016, the FDA announced that a labeling change will be required class-wide for immediate-release (IR) opioid medications prescribed for pain. According to their announcement, this change is a direct result of the FDA’s “continuing effort to educate prescribers and patients about the potential risks related to opioid use.”

    Subscribe to Regulatory Affairs